• Replying to comment by: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️Tbh the BRDM with ATGMs would probably make more sense than

    Yes, if the IT-1 project went ahead it would be interesting.

    3
    View
  • Honestly, in the animation I plan to make it won’t just focus on the fight between the T-72 and M-1 Abrams, maybe I’ll make an alternate story between the US and Iraq.
    The rebel forces used some tanks like the BMP-1 and 2, T-62 and IT-1 (even though the latter has had almost no success)
    Since the IT-1 uses the T-62 chassis, I can remake the chassis and finally make a new turret for it, based on the T-55. It’s a good option.

    8
  • Replying to comment by: Ralph (Developer)your name should be christank you don't really make sharks

    *Follow the script*
    Pretend this is an American shark

    2
    View
  • M-1A2 Abrams almost ready.

    All that’s left is to detail his side armor a little.
    Make the 7.62 M-240 light machine gun.
    Let’s go into a little more detail about the M-2HB.
    Make the other side of the turret

    That’s all for the rest.

    12
    • your name should be christank

      you don’t really make sharks

      nor chris’s

      2025-02-17 17:05:07 UTC 2
      • Replying to: Ralph (Developer)your name should be christank you don't really make sharks

        *Follow the script*
        Pretend this is an American shark

        2025-02-17 17:06:19 UTC 2
  • Almost finished! Just need some finishing touches and adding the additional armor plates to the sides of the chassis. (Maybe a slight rework on the track.)

    10
  • I’m still making the wheels.

    7
  • Replying to comment by: Vint.Multi-Role Planes. What can they be fit with? - A Single To

    I don\’t believe it\’s fully multifunctional.
    Following the line of the Second World War, fighter planes could carry bombs and heavy weapons and not be considered multi-role aircraft. The BF-109F2 or F4 could carry bombs from 250LB to 500LB, plus 8 light unguided rockets. Even more so with the F4 version that could carry 20MM cannon pods.
    Propeller-driven aircraft had their specific niche even though they could carry anti-tank weapons, etc. due to the limitations of the time. Nowadays you can build a bomber and a fighter all thanks to the design and jet engine, but not in the past.

    0
    View
  • A small update, I will still modify the entire chassis. The turret is now a small priority.

    10
  • Replying to comment by: A Conveniently GONE userpeak, make a tutorial on how to do that one day.

    I am going to try

    1
    View
  • Update.

    I ended up reducing the chassis a lot, especially the part where the turret is located, I saw that it is not that tall.

    16
  • Replying to comment by: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️Tbf if it was realistic the battle would last like a few sec

    I know, but it will take several minutes because the T-72 will have support lol, and like 2 Tiger Vs 50 T-34

    1
    View
  • I’m in the process of refining this first part of the animation. I’m testing shading and seeing how it looks, here’s a subtle difference.

    I don’t know exactly where to start to finish, over time different ways of how I will start this story emerge. Since I’m going to start working in about 5 minutes, I’ll basically take some free time to build a storyboard.

    The basics of history, It takes place in Iraq in 2005, in full governmental stability, after the American intervention and the establishment of a new government. Separatist forces supported by Russia and Iran, both indirectly and directly, are trying to oust the government And expel the Americans. Separatist forces attacked a large city near the Assyrian Desert, sending out a scouting force.

    The animation will not focus on the story, but rather on the battle between the M-1 Abrams and the T-72.

    9
    • shadows def always make things look better, gives it more depth

      2025-02-10 01:27:27 UTC 2
    • Tbf if it was realistic the battle would last like a few seconds considering the 120mm the Abrams uses absolutely annihilates T-72s (especially export ones like the ones Iraq would use)

      2025-02-10 02:19:25 UTC 3
      • Replying to: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️Tbf if it was realistic the battle would last like a few sec

        I know, but it will take several minutes because the T-72 will have support lol, and like 2 Tiger Vs 50 T-34

        2025-02-10 05:19:48 UTC 1
      • Replying to: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️Tbf if it was realistic the battle would last like a few sec

        As a former tank enjoyer, Abrams on a record barely encountered any Iraqi tanks, and if it did, it would absolutely annihilate it.

        For the most part, Iraqi’s tanks forces was destroyed before the abrams could make contact, all thanks to the contribution of the US air force.

        In fact, if I could recall correctly, Bradley destroyed more tanks than Abrams itself but I don’t have evidence to support this claim.

        2025-02-11 00:51:30 UTC 0
        • Replying to: A Conveniently GONE userAs a former tank enjoyer, Abrams on a record barely encounte

          If I recall, 73 Easting had at least a few T-72M1 kills done by M1A1HC Abrams units

          2025-02-11 11:55:25 UTC 1
          • Replying to: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️If I recall, 73 Easting had at least a few T-72M1 kills done

            That is actually true and was reported, I didn’t claim there was no engagement between an abram and a t72, but I am saying it’s incredibly, incredibly rare.

            2025-02-11 14:24:09 UTC 0
            • Replying to: A Conveniently GONE userThat is actually true and was reported, I didn't claim ther

              Fair I was just saying 73 Easting had enough of a concentration of Abrams on T-72 engagements to somewhat confidently determine the winner in such a duel

              2025-02-11 16:16:34 UTC 1
              • Replying to: 🏳️‍⚧️ Addie :3 🏳️‍⚧️Fair I was just saying 73 Easting had enough of a concentrat

                Also yeah the Bradley overall got more tank kills just from encountering tanks more frequently if I recall

                2025-02-11 16:22:03 UTC 0
    • peak, make a tutorial on how to do that one day.

      2025-02-10 14:09:12 UTC 0
      • Replying to: A Conveniently GONE userpeak, make a tutorial on how to do that one day.

        I am going to try

        2025-02-11 00:48:53 UTC 1
  • Replying to comment by: HerMajestyfriendly reminder that about 0.6% to 1.4% of the population

    Good thing I don\’t live in the United States

    4
    View
  • 8
  • Load More