Kirk said that “Gun deaths are worth it to maintain the second amendment”
I dont need to go up to you with a gun pointed at your head to incite you to commit violence, just saying that “violence is okay and you should do it” is already encouraging you to commit violence simply because you’re not gonna be punished for it.

Charlie Kirk was a piece of shit, yet you people are going “Nooo he didnt deserve to get killed!!!!”
But George Floyd? Oh no, he was a criminal. He had charges, “h-he shouldnt have been killed from a cop, he should’ve been trialed and sentenced to life in prision!!!!”
Dont turn a blind eye to people celebrating and calling it “facts”, just because you dont see something doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

People are still making fun of George Floyd up until this day, and absolutely nobody is batting an eye at that, Melissa Hortman (a Democratic Senator) got killed a few months back, the memes came in less than a day and nobody gave a shit.
Why are both of these cases okay, but Charlie Kirk is not?

You know…
I think it might be a bit of a drastic comparison, but i think it’s funny how much the mocking of Charlie Kirk’s death getting people fired shares a ton of similarities with the secret police back in 1930’s Germany.
I mean, citizens are snitching on their fellow countrymen because of their political view or something they said or did, ultimately getting them punished by a goverment agency?
Idk man, sounds like facism…

❌️❌️❌️string cheese