sarcasm doesn’t win you the conversation.

Lmfao.

I didn’t dislike your comment. So before you assume i disliked it, find some proof.

Oh, my proof? I disliked it now, see how PEOPLE LIKE ASSUMING?

Ronin, just go away already. your hole is already piercing the inner mantle and your still digging deeper. just do yourself a favour by just stopping, you’ve even unsheathed your Caps-Lock blade

this metaphor makes no sense, i’ve used caps-lock so it gets more attention, so people might read instead of assuming what i’ve said and dipsticking about it

so you’re clickbaiting your comments, very mature.

also, it only grabs attention in a negative way, it looks like you’re gettin’ real mad which looks like you’re snapping, which you clearly are.

now for the last damn time Ronin, drop it and just let people have the free will to say as they please, follow who they wish and do what they want to do.

Oh for FÛCK’S SAKE

I’M USING CAPS ON KEYWORDS THAT PEOPLE CAN READ, SO INSTEAD OF ASSUMING WHAT I’VE SAID, THEY’VE READ IT.

BUT YOU ALWAYS ASSUME WHAT I SAY, WHICH IS BIOLOGICALLY UNCOMPREHENDINGLY ANNOYING

Despite needing more detail
You criticize and don’t say how they should improve you say bad and impractical but don’t say how they should have fun with it
Your RHG head is impractical due to head weights and bulky shape

whil he does state how it could be improved

each people has different levels of skills, they can’t just automatically improve

this applies to my “git rich/gud” metaphor

while all that has been said, i don’t like how this hard-worked fig has been bombarded with dislikes

I might be nitpicking a little bit here but a metaphor is a comparison not whatever you’re using it there for.

Still gets the point across.

Not really when you think about it.

When you really do think about it, it does get the point across.

Explain how? Throwing figures of speech at people doesn’t get your point across as much as giving a good fact filled argument.

I’ve mistaken metaphor with another word, cool. Now stop making a big deal about it, people can still understand what i’ve meant when i’ve said it.

You’re the one here who started all this. My first guess would be you since you’re so locked into thinking you’re right. There was no reason to throw an insult and say that 3 other people should be ignored for criticizing. And I didn’t say you were the only one who disliked my reply, you can’t dislike 3 times unless you have alt accounts. Theres a few others that are so braindead that they don’t read the conversation and see the big picture. You do not say that critisism should be ignored. Yes there is a limit to how harsh people can be but those 2 comments at the top are far from it. I will say bootlegs comment is a little harsh but not at all cookies. Leave it to the figure creator. It’s honestly common sense as to why I would target you as one of the people to dislike. I don’t always agree with Epitaph, but all I hear from you is just pure hatred towards him. You stir up too much with him and you treat him like he ran over your pet. Grow up.

How did I miss this?!

I would be trashing Ronin right now, but I think it’s already been said. Stop being so spiteful.

Your a bit late to the party

I know, just nice to see the cocky bastard fail again

Conflict is still rolling. Jump in while you can!

Alright bet!

I’m not sure who’s side to be on
One the one hand epitaphs bull is pissing me off
On the other 2v10 is not a fight I want to get into right now

you should probably take a leave,

Chim is gonna troll you, that’s his profession.

Ironic, Chim

That is?

Oh, the fact that when you and some another guy that i’ve forgotten, you result in mindless insults without giving any context/insight at all.

Getting cocky enought that you’ll win through insults and making the other side look bad.

Sounds familiar doesn’t it.

Perhaps, but then again you’ve already lost this argument, so I don’t really need to go all out about your dumb choices in this thread.

there’s no such thing as losing or winning an argument, i’m getting deep here.

so really, why don’t you go on about my “dumb choices on this thread”? it seems like you’re proving my point that you’re cocky, but that’s not what i want to converse about on this comment

that is,

try.

And this comment is ironic as i’m getting cocky, hell, there’s no way to point this across without getting cocky.

(By god you’re just looking for more arguments) Well for a first, you deny that there is any faults in your argument, attack Epitaph for no actual purpose and drag the argument, stated that any criticism that is going to this fig should be ignored (I’m not saying that all of the criticism is good) and yeah.

“You deny that there is any faults in your argument.”

While i do agree i have “some” faults, would you mind “copy and pasting a comment of mine stating that i deny my faults?”

I didn’t attack Epitaph, it’s rather the opposite.

I didn’t mean to say ignore criticism, i meant to ignore those 2 comments as those are not defined critiques, those are insults.

As also, i’m genuinely glad to know you’re now giving context compared before.

Alright then

You didn’t say you had no faults, but you acted like to didn’t, just saying.

there’s no way to tell that other than a real conversation as it has mood and tone

comments do not

True

Damn, you just made this way less fun for me

This word might apply to me, but i describe you as ignorant.

“There was no reason to throw an insult and say that 3 other people should be ignored for criticizing.”

– Given that they spite the stig without giving any context as to why, but i’m not allowed to spite them, or refined as, insult them whilst they insult the fig, is very much, hypocrisy.

“And I didn’t say you were the only one who disliked my reply, you can’t dislike 3 times unless you have alt accounts.”

– You’ve stated “HE”, which applies to one person, and any right mind would assume that this is personally targeted at me.

“Theres a few others that are so braindead that they don’t read the conversation and see the big picture.”

– This is rather ironic or fallacy, i can call you braindead right now as you as well, don’t see this “big picture”. To me, it sounds that you are too wounded that you think you are right enough to call fellows “braindead”, in the end of the day, insults don’t win you anything. I’m asking you something, besides the first comment of mine, when did i insult the ones i’m arguing with on this thread?

“It’s honestly common sense as to why I would target you as one of the people to dislike.”

– I know, it’s called disagreeing. Even my innocent comment stating: “I don’t understand”, was disliked. It’s rather common.

“I don’t always agree with Epitaph, but all I hear from you is just pure hatred towards him. You stir up too much with him and you treat him like he ran over your pet. Grow up.”

– AGAIN, what kind of Google answer did you look up to lead you into this conclusion? I’m sick and tired of people pulling random fallacies out of nowhere and call it facts. Give some context.

I read the comments. I don’t lack knowledge or information on this subject. They didn’t quite insult the figure. And insult is only meant to hurt, not notify like what cookies was like. Bootlegs was light. A little harsh but it wasn’t even a full fledged insult. I also used he in my comment to point towards you to show what I think about the person who instigated the argument. He does in fact refer to you but you were the only one I could think of who would dislike there. This is also so hypocritical of you to say this because you got mad at cookie for disliking your comment whe he didn’t. So I pointed you out but me saying “some dislikes” should be obvious that I’m aware that there is some people that support you. With that leading up to me say “a few others that are braindead”. Common sense. The word “braindead” is to show that they are siding with someone who is to me just too obviously in the wrong. You cannot possibly say that you weren’t the one who started this when you attacked the other comments first glance. True, insults do not win you battles but they do reinforce the fact that you aren’t happy with someones actions. The times you insulted were when you said:
-You being butthurt (A little light so I will give this one a pass)
-The fact that you call yourselves critics is an insult (An insult in itself)
-Being dyslexic explains a lot

I would list more that boil down to insults but the argument is large and I would be wasting time. Yes there are people that are biased. But this is natural to come from both sides. Disagreeing does in fact have to do with me thinking you disliked my comment. You don’t need to point that out. You also know you have gotten into arguments with Epitaph before unless you have short term memory loss problems. I also type what I think. I don’t search up on google how to hit back. You get mad out of knowere at a single comment he makes the critisizes a figure. That’s were I get that. I’m not calling it facts because I’m not completely sure about it but I’m a pretty sure I remember you getting mad at Epitaph for simply commenting that a figure could use some work. It’s not hard to pull the context out of that one.

This is now the longest argument here

Yes. Well. Idk. I’ve been involved in bigger.

context request by me, how did you know that i’m mad that Cookie disliked me or anyone else? I know you are disliking me right now even whilst i stand right, am i pointing it out? I used those terms to validate my statement that people are biased, am i wrong?

“The word “braindead” is to show that they are siding with someone who is to me just too obviously in the wrong.”

– i’m not completely right, at least provide context. Are you also telling me it’s alright to promote such invalid acts? If you were to tell me this is “freedom of act”, this is the abuse of it, hence laws.

“The fact that you call yourselves a critic is an insult”
It’s not even an insult, it’s just a fact that i’ve stated with hyperbole. Critics doesn’t act like this.

“Being dyslexic explains alot” is not an insult, this is just pure nitpicking. I’ve said that as a definitive acknowledgment that he has dyslexia.

“You get mad out of knowere at a single comment he makes the critisizes a figure.”

– This is another fallacy that requires context.

Almost all of your points are simply assumptions without validations which equate to a wrong conclusion. You lack context.

All this argument and anger is only making hatelings and demise stronger

jesus f*** this guy must be so happy that his stickfigure has this many comments

Your conversation with cookie right here is just obvious as to where you are just wrong in.

-Ronin
i’m pretty sure you’ve seen my link to this word: Hyperbole

As you’ve disliked it as such, what a critic you are.

-Cookie
Who said I disliked it? Like again, other people could do that. Bootleg could have done it.

-Ronin
Who knows. All i know is biased people are disliking me.

Doesn’t make them right, doesn’t make me wrong either.

You saying this is exactly were I was. You attacked me over the same exact thing you did here. Pure hypocrisy. The proof is all above. And sure, I will use some stuff I’m not sure about and throw it at you. It’s just a matter of you responding to it with a valid answer to prove your side in that issue. I also said that it is true that people are biased. It’s natural, no need to point that out. It’s definetly fine to use facts that might not be right, but it’s better to bring them up to get answers around them than just leave them clouded. If you can’t defend something that is so “invalid” then you are in the wrong there. You also can’t abuse freedom if that’s what you are saying there.
With your comment on the insult “The fact that you call yourselves a critic is an insult” is not a direct insult but it boils down to an insult when you look at that statements deeper meaning. You said that they can’t be critics and that it’s insulting to you that they consider themselves critics. You are basically saying an alternative of they are such bad critics that they shouldn’t even be called critics. That statement is simply demeaning. If you are using hyperboles, you should know they don’t show well on the internet unless they are actually exaggerated enough that people understand it. And with you using dyslexia as an insult, you can’t possibly use it as something positive. It’s basically a fill in the blank here. “You being dyslexic explains why you’re so smart” That doesn’t fit. “You being dyslexic explains why you are so stupid” fits a lot more for the purpose of you saying that. Claiming everything as a “fallacy” requiring context is showing you are only clueless. You got mad it him for saying this figure could use work as well as everyone else, I have seen you do this on other figures too. I can’t name the figures because theres so many on the website to remember but I’m sure that Epitaph could name a few since he has been involved in them. You are assuming that I am assuming that you are doing certain things. This is an odd statement but is screams hypocrite. I don’t make any assumptions here, in fact I throw some things at you that are particularly weak to see if you can answer them. I also don’t create the context. You create the context when reading and I can only intend for a certain context to be seen. You’re only just refusing to comprehend anything I type.

LMAO
And it’s accurate

Just perfect, pizza delivery guy is gonna want to come another time.

Bullocks.

While there may have been some flaws in my arguments, the point still stands.

The word me “attacking” you apparently, is another nitpick. Calling me an asshole without even showing why, and i can’t defend myself?

– EB
“Hah. No problem. I see I’ve recieved some dislikes for telling him to back off. Funny. I think he’s being a little bit of an asshole right now.”

– Me.
“I didn’t dislike your comment. So before you assume i disliked it, find some proof.
Oh, my proof? I disliked it now, see how PEOPLE LIKE ASSUMING?”

I was pissed off so badly i made a point about how people assume, which is defined as a Strawman.

Undeniable.

“If you can’t defend something that is so “invalid” then you are in the wrong there.”

– This made no sense as to the lack of context. And NO, this is not an insult.

“The fact that you call yourselves a critic is an insult”

– There is a fine line between cold hard truth and insults. Truth with hyperboles sound like an insult, but if you skin it’s meaning enough, it all goes bare bones to this; You are a bad critic. Again, it’s so easy to assume what a comment meant on the internet that you’d lose it’s original value.

“You are basically saying an alternative of they are such bad critics that they shouldn’t even be called critics. That statement is simply demeaning.”

– No. Being blunt.

“Claiming everything as a “fallacy” requiring context is showing you are only clueless.”

– Ironically enough, with a quick Google search, this commits a Fallacy Fallacy, yes it’s 2 words.

– “You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong.”

Well? Am i wrong to call them fallacies?

“You being dyslexic explains why you’re so smart” That doesn’t fit. “You being dyslexic explains why you are so stupid” fits a lot more for the purpose of you saying that.”

– Son of a f*cking b*tch. Are you so point driven that even when the main commentator explains to you what his word means, you’ll still use the previous thought meaning? This is another f*cking nitpick, also commits a fallacy called “Strawman”.

“You got mad it him for saying this figure could use work as well as everyone else”

– You said you don’t assume right? But where did Epitaph say this stig needs work and i got mad about it?

“I don’t make any assumptions here, in fact I throw some things at you that are particularly weak to see if you can answer them.”

– Claims without evidence, is just assumptions. Like your sentence here.

“You’re only just refusing to comprehend anything I type.”

– No. I’ve been abusing the word ironic lately, but this really defines it. Ironic. As this part lacked context, i’m gonna give you;

assumptions.

Dude. Get a grip of yourself. Your only reading my comments at this point to reply and not to understand. You’ve done this to the point that you have become extremely arrogant. I never said you couldn’t defend yourself. But you could at least use a single brain cell to comprehend that I’m saying that it is an asshole move to tell someone to ignore a bunch of people trying to help him… That right there is setting someone up for failure. This is where you have me on your case. You have completely ignored that you are in fact a hypocrite. I h
gave you some damn solid proof of why you are that, you have ignored that. You hate how people assume yet you did that exact thing to cookie. If you’re gonna call out that stuff, you may as well not do it yourself in the first place. Heck, you even supported the fact that people will dislike out of being biased yet you fail to go by what you said there. I expected you to be biased and dislike the comment out of the reason it attacked you. And jeeze, how dense can you possibly be to say that lacks context. A bloody five year old could understand what that’s saying. Let’s make it super simplified here. If you have no defence for one of your actions, then you are wrong. Look. Once again, I don’t create the context. The reader does. I can go only as far as to intend for something to be viewed in a certain context. I can explain how something should be viewed but not force the reader to view it a certain way first glance. And no duh that is not an insult. Your statement about them not being critics is literally saying that they have no right to judge anyone. Critics are anyone who judge stuff and that statement itself shows you thinking rather highly of yourself. Once again with arrogance. Like I said as well with hyperboles. They don’t show online. I don’t see any sort of exaggeration in your comment. It’s best you resort to something that actually will be understood other than a joke that only you understand. Theres something called rewording, it’s not just grabbing the same statement like what you did with many of your insult and coating it in paint. Saying “No. Being blunt” is the weakest sentence to support your side so far. That right there doesn’t support anything, it’s just saying “no” which is a loss on your side until further explanation. A fallacy is faulty reasoning, until you get down to the deepest details of an argument, you can’t claim it as a fallacy. You only call my arguments fallacys which shows that you are clueless. You can’t tell why I’m wrong.

-– “You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong.”

Explain why this must be wrong.

You are only wrong to call them fallacys because you haven’t provided why they show faulty reasoning.

– Son of a f*cking b*tch. Are you so point driven that even when the main commentator explains to you what his word means, you’ll still use the previous thought meaning? This is another f*cking nitpick, also commits a fallacy called “Strawman”.

Theres no support argument whatsoever in this that it’s once again a loss until you can provide explanation. You can’t just throw a bunch of attacks into something and say it proves a point. This weakens your point. Once again you say I have faulty reasoning, prove it. You don’t need to say it, you need to prove it by attacking the arguments someone makes. I don’t in fact make many assumptions, I will correct that to what I really meant to say there. I will only make certain ones base on memory, I simply just cant find the proof. The website is a big place but I brought those up to see if you would own up to attacking Epitaphs on many different occations. Assumptions are more making accusations of someone doing something without their point being proven, but just being made up. You don’t get my point of me throwing a few weak arguments at you. I do that to see if you can answer them to see what’s right and what’s wrong. The point of an argument is not to see who’s right exactly, but what is right. Thats why I throw those at you, it’s pretty much seeing both sides of the story, something you don’t seem to fond about. Now by context, I didn’t mean misinterpret what I say to the point that your argument has no base. Assumptions are making accusations based on no evidence and thinking they are right. I don’t think these weak points are right which drags them away from being assumptions. You create the context, I can only go as far as for saying how it’s supposed to be interpreted. Quit relying on me to create the context for you because I can’t.

This has turned to civil war

1) thank you Bullet, your professional attitude definitely sports an air of intelligence.

2) I don’t want to get myself tugged back in this s**thole but i do have some evidence as to Ronin’s aggressiveness against myself. You see, I’ve noticed older users like Chimdi O and Jack seemed to despise me once my influence started to kick in and the modern StickNodes rolled in.
They’ve calmed down ad adjusted now but I believe Ronin may have not. He refuses to do anything relatively positive around me or any of my associates.

This makes me believe that he’s simply pi**ed that my influence doesn’t line up exactly how he’d want it to be. He’s a very assuming and sly kind of person so it wouldn’t surprise me.

Anyway, that’s just some more ammo for you Bullet.

Chaos has broken in

You know, Chim is actually pretty chill now. Even for being considered the websites biggest asshole. Hell he plays along with it too. Theres problems I’ve had with Ronin for a while and I’ve been silent about them. He seems a little whiney about certain things and is rather arrogant. It’s nice to know I’m not the only one who thought that. There certainly a select few people that don’t like you, nor me for pushing in a more respectful community. But we just gotta keep working toward that. Theres still a large portion of SN animators that are hard to watch but are very popular and others that are so into creating the same exact animations and storylines as other animators.

Epitaph thought I hated him? Huh, nah you cool

Might’ve mixed you up with some other users. Not sure.

Now we wait for Ronin to submit his 8-page essay with over 10,000 words.
For real though guys stop. Your only adding fuel to the flame.

lel

thnak fam

I wouldn’t call Bullet’s attitude professional, don’t worry, i’m not professional either.

Ok, i’ll make this short.

“He refuses to do anything relatively positive around me or any of my associates.”

Another form of accusation, to what part did i do this. Have you forgotten i casually like or often commit rather terrible jokes at your posts.

“He’s a very assuming and sly kind of person so it wouldn’t surprise me.“

Give me a single comment that i was very assuming, just one, then i would shut the hell up. But then again, you’ve assumed one thing right. I’m sly, depends on what you’ve meant on it although, this word has numerous meanings.

Just because i disagree in “some” of your ways, that you should completely negate my positive doings. It’s bull.

i’m a little tired right now so this reply might be a lot more inconsistent.

Fair disclaimer, i’ve ignored a lot of what you’ve said as it was just passive aggressive wordings. You might ask proof for this, like you say, you won’t be able to comprehend the entire meaning of a sentence on the internet.

“But you could at least use a single brain cell to comprehend that I’m saying that it is an asshole move to tell someone to ignore a bunch of people trying to help him… That right there is setting someone up for failure.”

– I don’t see how saying how bad the fig is, is helping anyone. It’s simply the same as saying you’re poor, does not help.

“Look. Once again, I don’t create the context. The reader does.”

– This is improper reasoning as such it allows innacurate understanding to a depiction.
Ex:
A movie is titled “Revenge”, but the if you’ve watched the movie, it’s just friends having some fun. So why is it titled Revenge? The viewers must instead answer this, not the writer nor the director. This is the form that you are applying.

“Critics are anyone who judge stuff and that statement itself shows you thinking rather highly of yourself.”

– You are getting “User Reviews” and “Critics” mixed up. User reviews are people with either biased or unbiased opinion, each vary. Critics are professional people with experience and as much as possible be constructive with their sentences. Give me a critic with such foul wordings, then i would immediately lose this point.

——“Claiming everything as a “fallacy” requiring context is showing you are only clueless.”

“Explain why this must be wrong.
You are only wrong to call them fallacys because you haven’t provided why they show faulty reasoning.“

– Then if your sentence hasn’t had any flaws, would you like to explain why you think i claim everything as a fallacy and why does it make me clueless?

You told me to explain your faulty reasoning, right. Look below.

“it’s pretty much seeing both sides of the story, something you don’t seem to fond about.“

“Something you don’t seem fond about”

– You see, you keep throwing dramatic sentences without even so at least a little explanation. You keep getting ideas of what i feel like by your gut, not by your mind. You can use these previous sentences to say i’m assuming you too, oh no, i got these from what i’ve read in your “argument”.

“You don’t get my point of me throwing a few weak arguments at you.”

– Again, this is rather ironic/hypocritical as you always give me the point that; you wouldn’t be able to understand that much an internet comment.

“Quit relying on me to create the context for you because I can’t.”

– Then don’t state anything at all, how am i supposed to, or anyone, really, gonna make a point if neither understands the point made?

“He seems a little whiney about certain things and is rather arrogant.“

– “AGAIN”, this needs context.

Final notes.
You only write subtle formats, but you expect me to realize what they meant. Evidence:

– “You create the context, I can only go as far as for saying how it’s supposed to be interpreted.”

You make passive-aggressive metaphor directly aimed at me. I don’t know the reason, but you’re being a dick.
Evidence:

– “But you could at least use a single brain cell to comprehend—“

– “And jeeze, how dense can you possibly be to say that lacks context. A bloody five year old could understand what that’s saying.”

– And many more, i just don’t have the time.

This is getting old, it takes around 30 mins to formulate these answers and you’d just ignore most points and target the weakest ones.

Oh yeah, something irks me also-

“He seems a little whiney about certain things and is rather arrogant.”

– I’m overusing context, so i’m using a different word. Would you like to explain how you think of me as this? With evidence.

Read everything. Don’t just read random points and make a steady long argument which is a little less than half innacurate to what i’ve meant.

“So you are still mad? Wow.”

Context, please.

k

Ronin, did you dig this?

http://meteorcrater.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/meteor_no_sunset1100x469.jpg

i don’t understand, epitaph.

i’m saying that your argument is going no where, you’re only digging a bigger hole for yourself.

if you want even a sliver of reputation left after this, just run away from this argument. you’ve degraded into a whiny little b**ch by this point who feels the need to write a brand new dictionary every single time we say a word.

so for the love of that non-existent god, shut the f**k up, nobody gives a s**t.

https://giphy.com/gifs/problems-nrXif9YExO9EI

ya got me there, i just didn’t want to say it linearly because i just don’t want to.

besides, you don’t bat an eye when Spierr goes full priest, why can’t i say as i please too huh

Anyone can preach their beliefs
Spierr can
You can

It’s just that you’re often rude to what his belief is.

P.S. who is disliking epitaph? i don’t like getting accused

Welp not me

I’ve been trying to be rational as possible but it seems like it doesn’t work. Even this simple statement needs evidence to you people, see how i’ve tried to not insult anyone except the first comment, which was a sarcastic comment.

The only reason my argument is going nowhere is because people like you are too caught up in defending yourselves that no matter how my point is right, yours is more right.

You call me a whiny btch, whilst you are there whining at me instead of calling me out on any argumentative flaws.

“so for the love of that non-existent god, shut the f**k up, nobody gives a s**t.”

Obvious hyperbole but i’m still going to point out that some people do care enough. Just too scared to be caught up in the heat of this site’s most popular contributors.

ITS TIME TO STOP

what reason do you even have, he’s the obvious problem.

This argument is longer than you vs Spierr

1) nobody gives a s**t about your fancy writing language and your A+ in English.

2) i’m having a little whine cause i’m sick of you blasting stupid s**t out your ass in my direction. do you want to know why i targeted you in that post, to warn you to back the f**k off. i’ve gotten pi**ed at Spierr before, you know that and on the first time it scared him off the site. i can say some cruel s**t when i want to and you’re bringing me to that boiling point. so if you would rather not have your face metaphorically peeled off by searing pliers, i’d shut the f**k up, go on your merry way and leave me and my friends well alone before i come over there and teach you a thing or f**king two.

what the hell epitaph

this comment of yours just makes you sound like a dick. again, not an insult, just an insight

This argument has gone in long enough. It’s best we all move on and forget about this. Deal?

yeah, why not

it shouldn’t even start in the first place

You could have avoided it if you hadn’t commented.

That logic applies to me not commentating at anything at all, just to avoid petty arguments.

Just accept it, i didn’t start the argument. It’s on the replier’s virtue.

Wow I didn’t find this until just now but all I want to say is that I agree mostly with ronin, and that every time Epitaph says something about destroying somebody’s reputation it makes him sound like a dickbutt