-
finna start getting more strict with some posts that are gonna be classified as spam I think
1) posts that are just “hello” or some similar variant (exceptions: a legitimate introductory post with some actual thought put into it)
2) posts that confusingly reference other posts or continue a conversation – with absolutely no explicit link or explanation for reference aka “freddy is winning the poll” – …what poll?
“what about posts that are just ‘hmm’ or something?”
– to be determined, as such posts are typically occasional and by senior members just shitpostingdiscuss






Everything posted by Ralph Damiano should be qualified as spam. Give me God Status on the site Ralph oh god please
He boutta pull the ban hammer on ya, Red.
then was my post about d4c or whitesnake deleted
was it?
idk even sometimes i get drunk and just delete shit
(this is a joke)
My dick is quite itchy , can you get it for me Ralph ?
UwU
Kinky Rolf-chan
“freddy is winning the poll”
…
He said you have to link the post and/or the poll itself
This is help others know what your talking about if they didn’t see the first post and such , so it’s not too “spam” looking
Hmm
I kinda wanna break your rules now ,and feel retarded for having that urge
bc u r
t r u e
That’s a great move actually, glad to see some good change, it would encourage users to be relevant and post more actual content.
regardless of rule changes (reducing unintentional spam) the thing is, it wouldn’t be uniformly applied
simply bc I’m not onling 24/7 (nor is any admin)
so sure, when I get on I’ll scroll down a bit and maybe delete stuff – but, I’d miss a lot (I’m not gonna go through every post every day) and also, maybe some of these otherwise-deleted threads now have a big conversation ongoing or something
idk its always more difficult than it seems, things like this
Maybe create an option for flagging a comment for spam, pornography etc. and it gets hidden from the public and an admin gets notified and decides whether it stays or not.
Not sure if possible though because of WordPress plus I hear you’re not amazing with website work compared to app work, I refer to you for that by the way.
thats a good idea, i could likely code in a feature like that, but then comes the problem of abusing that feature
tho I guess if enough people flag something it’s likely to be valid
still, as we’ve see here sometimes people dogpile on others for no good reason and well-
Make a controversial designation option of ‘Moderation Users’ for more mature down-to-earth users to report to an admin.
o fuk thats right, i can…actually make a simple “mod” role
…big hmmmmmmmm
might actually do that and blame you for all the fallout
The criteria should be something like ‘user for over 2 years, must be signed in every once a month’ and then a final deciding by the admins.
totes voting for you h
Thanks
shit, ralph why are you trying to cancel me?
hmm
@ralph here’s my entry
i’m going to pull a tricky and link you to a shock site one day