• Profile picture of arcionek

    arcionekadministratorocciferuc-votermega-noderfeatured-lvl1uc-winner-lvl2 2019-03-05 18:54:08 UTC

    So, there’s solid discussion of what temperature is twice as cold as 0°C and we are going wild with theories and even trying to come up with our own scale to attempt to somehow explain it. Anyways, what are your own theories on it?

    0
    • K, 0°C = 32°F. So if we half it, we will get 16°F so convert that into °C. done

      2019-03-05 19:19:23 UTC 0
      • Replying to: Ayaan (⛒ ͜ ⛒)K, 0°C = 32°F. So if we half it, we will get 16°F so convert

        but 10°C is considered cold, wouldn’t that make -10°C twice as cold as 0°C?

        2019-03-05 19:21:22 UTC 0
        • Replying to: arcionekbut 10°C is considered cold, wouldn't that make -10°C twice

          Logical explaination. @arcionek
          …or we could just ask Siri.

          2019-03-05 20:02:31 UTC 0
          • Replying to: Unfunny AnimeLogical explaination. @arcionek ...or we could just ask Siri

            I googled and there’s no definite anwser.

            2019-03-05 20:09:47 UTC 0
            • Replying to: arcionekI googled and there's no definite anwser.

              Hm…
              What about-

              I N T E R N E T. E X P L O R E R.

              2019-03-05 20:11:19 UTC 0
        • Replying to: arcionekbut 10°C is considered cold, wouldn't that make -10°C twice

          No, cuz u need to half 0 (which is not possible, u need to convert it into °F) We can however, divide other numbers by 2 and get a number which lies on the number line.

          2019-03-05 20:11:57 UTC 0
          • Replying to: Ayaan (⛒ ͜ ⛒)No, cuz u need to half 0 (which is not possible, u need to c

            But, 0 Celcius is also 273.15 Kelvin. Which divided by 2 makes it -136.575°C…

            Afterall, I don’t have to convert it into just Fahrenheit.

            2019-03-05 20:14:04 UTC 0
            • Replying to: arcionekBut, 0 Celcius is also 273.15 Kelvin. Which divided by 2 mak

              Hmm…..

              2019-03-05 20:15:07 UTC 0
              • Replying to: Ayaan (⛒ ͜ ⛒)Hmm.....

                But what’s worse, the temperature is twice as low, meaning it’s actually times 2 instead divided by 2. But if we did that, the temperature would be rising.

                2019-03-05 20:16:40 UTC 0
                • Replying to: arcionekBut what's worse, the temperature is twice as low, meaning

                  This is difficult… But if the temperature goes down, school will be closed so its good.

                  2019-03-05 20:20:26 UTC 0
    • *flips my phone weather app upside down*

      2019-03-05 20:20:23 UTC 1
    • only elite einsteins use fahrenkelvius

      2019-03-05 20:23:20 UTC 0
      • Replying to: dezwayonly elite einsteins use fahrenkelvius

        I made my own temperature scale, based of a cirlce. 0 is freezing water and 360 is boiling. It’s measured in arc’s.

        2019-03-05 20:32:16 UTC 0
    • I searched 0 Celcius to Kelvin, then divided by 0 and converted back. So that’s why changing the system seems inaccurate and wrong.

      2019-03-05 20:34:52 UTC 0
    • I think it’s pretty straight forward as 180°arc would be 50°C

      2019-03-05 20:43:04 UTC 0