3.6/10
Needs more detail, possibly a list of abilities, if they have any, more descriptive/specific description, go to thesaurus.com so your description isnt so bland, maybe lower some of the stats so if you make a series with them, they dont start off as powerful, maybe a slightly more creative name. Overall Pretty bland, not very interesting, but not horrible
Replying to:TRK3.6/10
Needs more detail, possibly a list of abilities, if t
A basic figure can be good but that doesnt mean use a base fig, add some clothes, make a bland backstory, list off some characteristics, and call it a day
I really like it!
this is pretty simple no detail what so ever. If you need i can upgrade him send me him on my email [email protected]
no thanks im good
ill just put a scarf on it
*laughing in the background*
Putting a scarf on it doesnt make anything better it actually makes it worst
HOOOOOOOOOly sh*t dude this is aweful
what do you mean it looks good
too OP, unoriginal backstory, bad design, start anew.
ill be happy to provide tips for you.
My friends rhg is fine >:(
3.6/10
Needs more detail, possibly a list of abilities, if they have any, more descriptive/specific description, go to thesaurus.com so your description isnt so bland, maybe lower some of the stats so if you make a series with them, they dont start off as powerful, maybe a slightly more creative name. Overall Pretty bland, not very interesting, but not horrible
A basic figure can be good but that doesnt mean use a base fig, add some clothes, make a bland backstory, list off some characteristics, and call it a day
Also @epitaph200 are you seeing these posts? These RHGs are f**kin “gold”
User Banned
I’ve found better quality at Chernobyl
Lol
Yeah thats what i meant, its so horrible its almost funny
A l m o s t
thanks gunny
Thats ok but im just giving some ideas telling them where they could improve
It’s a great start for an rhg