Replying to:Tastylemon16Depends on the source and the amount of people who agree and
It makes more sense with context.
They’re talking about things with government documents. People just assume they are right because the cia has a document on it. Happened with antivaxxing, shifting, and probably many others tbh.
It’s unintelligible to say that you’re right because the government had some sort of speech about it— when they weren’t even aiming to prove something about the mentioned topic.
2021-07-21 00:43:13 UTC 
what?
Depends on the source and the amount of people who agree and have been able to back up said source and their info.
I disagree with their statement.
It makes more sense with context.
They’re talking about things with government documents. People just assume they are right because the cia has a document on it. Happened with antivaxxing, shifting, and probably many others tbh.
It’s unintelligible to say that you’re right because the government had some sort of speech about it— when they weren’t even aiming to prove something about the mentioned topic.
I agree there I’m saying from collective findings and proof then I myself would deem it a reliable source of information.