• Replying to comment by: Unknownlol?

    huh, i forgot lol exists

    probably because it’s more often used to troll unfunny jokes

    So uhh, lol?

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Unknowni want that gun to get featured 3 times in a row it's that

    I know i keep saying lmao

    But i don’t know what else to say lmao

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Ramoxfire V2Ok thank you for at least listening

    but ya know, i might do it some other time :]

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Ramoxfire V2So will you try this or are you going to pass

    pass

    i have a lot of blessings for SN to make and submit

    You should try RHG shop, see if a random bloke will check you out

    0
    View
  • I don’t know why would a salty nut dislike the top 3 features for today, but stop it, FFS.

    1
  • Replying to comment by: UnknownOwie, lots of text

    So i’m just gonna copy paste a genius’ remarks here:

    I completely understand that people didn\’t like the pay to win system at the beginning of the game\’s release, and I totally get that. But what I don\’t understand is that it was pretty much fixed on the second day of the game being released, and yet people still think that it is pay to win. What else is wrong with the game? NOTHING, except from star cards like the supercharged sentry. But that stuff is going to be fixed. Every game is unbalanced when it first is released, and that is okay.
    The problem I have with what this guy is saying on reddit is that he didn\’t look into what you can actually get in loot boxes before he wasted $80 on them. FYI, you can\’t get heroes in loot boxes. Plus, it\’s no big deal that Vader is still locked. I got him in less than 2 hours during the full release of the game. In my opinion, it\’s ridiculous that you would ask for an $80 refund just because you didn\’t get exactly everything that you wanted. I think what EA was trying to say was that there has to be something to work towards in the game, and that is definitely true. They may not have said it in the best way, obviously they didn\’t because the reddit users seemed to think that this was the most ridiculous thing in the world.
    So why do I think people hate this game so much? Why has it become gamer\’s testing ground for a game to laugh at? After all, most people (including me) that play the game are happy with the way it turned out. It\’s probably because everyone is getting on the anti-EA bandwagon. Everyone seems to despise EA for some unknown reason. If this game was made exactly the same by a different company, everyone would love it. So many other games have pay to win systems, much more so than battlefront 2 does. But just because they are made by a different company, no one hates those games.
    Anyways, this is a great game, and I know I\’ll be having much more fun playing this game than all of these other people. And while they may love those games, I think that they should give this game a shot, despite the pay to win system that only even lasted one day. So if you want to laugh at me for siding with EA, fine go ahead. But just know that this one of the best games right now, and is just being overlooked for no good reason. EA gave the community what it asked for, and doesn\’t deserve all of this backlash.

    Okay, here’s me again, done with the copy-paste.

    A company has to make money too. As i’ve seen on many trailers, it has phenomenal graphics. I’m sure we know how expensive it is to pull that off.

    I don’t know the difference in-game, but i’m sure there’s at least improvements since the first game. If not, then i’m wrong.

    We’re looking for gameplay which why we buy games, i only buy a few promising ones, BF hasn’t been on my radar so my credibility is a bit low. Let me get that off.

    If those that can be acquired only through purchases are OP, ok, that’s bad game design. But, if those were cosmetics, no real argument can be made against that.

    This was an even wall of text, also i’m probably never buying BF lol, i’m finishing Mario Odyssey.

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Ramoxfire V2If you do try this what would be the time frame

    A month, more or less

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: roninwhoah geez, i don’t play those games but you might give me a

    i don’t know if you’ve read my question yet so i’m just gonna @epitaph200 you

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Ramoxfire V2Open request can someone please make this
    772

    I probably can but due to my OCD, i wouldn’t leave a single inch of detail. And that would take like 10 figs.

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: UnknownHELLO YES STAR WARS BATTLEFRONT 1 AND 2 WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A

    whoah geez, i don’t play those games but you might give me a clear explanation why you hate them?

    0
    View
  • @ralph

    I’m wondering, haven’t you thought of figs being featured like this; Most Ratings in a day instead of downloads? Cause that gives more of a fairness rather than having DB, Fortnite, Sonic in their description for downloads.

    1
    • Ralph: no I love pissing people off lolololololol

      2018-06-18 13:50:51 UTC 1
    • yes

      in fact it was etipafz idea a while back

      it just requires a lot more work than you’d think

      and I don’t feel like it
      and also my time is better spent with app work or neater website features

      but I’ll do it one day probs

      2018-06-18 16:04:48 UTC 0
      • Replying to: Ralph (Developer)yes in fact it was etipafz idea a while back it just requi

        Both systems can be abused.

        As searching a keyword, it also shows up stigs that contains the keyword in the description. “Abusable”.

        Voting system, perharps would cause a little more of a Ahole behavior towards stigs for the competition of the title. “Unnecessary downvotes”.

        ok u kno wat, you’re actually right, the current one is better. I don’t want people being Aholes to each other

        2018-06-18 16:34:18 UTC 0
        • Replying to: roninBoth systems can be abused. > As searching a keyword, it

          for the searching thing, I’m also going to be adding a filter soon to only search titles/authors/descriptions to make that better

          as for the voting, it would be a hybrid

          each vote, for example, would be a point (negative downvote total = negative points)

          then add on maybe 0.5 points for every 1 download

          so votes matter more, but downloads still contribute

          something like that

          2018-06-18 16:41:49 UTC 1
          • Replying to: Ralph (Developer)for the searching thing, I'm also going to be adding a filt

            Yeah, but i’m afraid having downvote as a scoring factor increases negativity towards people, it might even encourage trolls.

            But anything for a better system-ish :/

            2018-06-18 16:47:42 UTC 1
  • Replying to comment by: DankSherk83Hmmm...
    1127_0-09793100-1529308256_32c47b5c-09

    i don’t get this but i like it

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: jomart catalino emmanuel de pota thirteenth son o@epitaph200 E.A in a Nutshell E.A: Why do we make bad games?

    Eh.

    They make good games, this circle-jerk has no sustenance.

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: Explosive BulletNot that I know of.

    🤔

    gives me an idea

    0
    View
  • Replying to comment by: UnknownOH I DON'T KNOW MAYBE HIS CROTCH

    oh good to know

    0
    View
  • Load More