• Profile picture of FaoLOr64

    FaoLOr64uc-votersubscribermaster-noderfeatured-lvl2uc-winner-lvl3crusader 2019-04-13 02:03:07 UTC

    I made a simpler (less nodes and less details) version of @explosivebullet ‘s 5.56 bullet from his m4a1 pack

    1
    • 10

      2019-04-13 02:46:33 UTC 0
    • How many nodes? Also that projectile looks a little too long.

      2019-04-13 03:10:24 UTC 0
      • Replying to: Explosive BulletHow many nodes? Also that projectile looks a little too long

        the projectile is the correct size according to my reference photo
        also here are the comparisons
        Compared with explosive bullet’s 5.56 bullet
        Explosive bullet’s 5.56 cartridge=54 nodes 5.56 shell=35 nodes
        FaoLOr64’s 5.56 cartridge=25 nodes 5.56 shell=19 nodes

        2019-04-13 03:12:43 UTC 0
        • Replying to: FaoLOr64the projectile is the correct size according to my reference

          Not bad. And this is without any glitching between the gradient square nodes. If so good. And with reference photos you gotta be a little careful. The don’t always show accurate sizes due to angles and all that. By the looks of the bullet there, I have a feeling the propelled action of the bullet would be screwed up a little bit by how chunk of the bullet would be surrounded by the gunpowder. And bullets require a propeling action forward only.

          2019-04-13 03:28:23 UTC 0
          • Replying to: Explosive BulletNot bad. And this is without any glitching between the gradi

            There are no problems with the angles of reference photos, all of them where taken directly above the subject

            2019-04-13 04:29:45 UTC 0
            • Replying to: FaoLOr64There are no problems with the angles of reference photos, a

              Alright. It does look a little longer that what I have seen for references though.

              2019-04-13 14:45:27 UTC 0