I needed it for a tutorial video but now I look back at it, I probably could have just recorded myself using various things and then cut to some text explaining what I just did.
Replying to:FervorBottom. Looks really accurate though, nice work.
Thanks, it was all a big waste of time though, I could’ve just recorded a video of me using certain features that i’d want to discuss and then putting slides of explanation about them.
I needed it for a tutorial video but now I look back at it, I probably could have just recorded myself using various things and then cut to some text explaining what I just did.
I’ll do that actually.
The bottom is the recreation. Obviously.
^
The quality gives it away.
i guess the upper one is the screenshot
not sure tho
User Banned
Bottom is way more smoother So it’s the recreation
I say the middle is the screenshot and the top is the recreation
Dang it looks real doe
The bottom, I was about to say the top but the other versions of shapes aren’t low in opacity.
You spotted the difference, congratulations.
The other difference was the quality.
Bottoms the recreation I think
Hella good job btw :0
The bottom.
Much more cleaner than a screenshot
you can see the “0” on the top is a little bit oval while the bottom is a circle. Most of the “o” is a little bit oval so the bottom are .nodes
Circle, Ellipse and triangle secondary parts are transparent slightly unlike the other one
Bottom. Looks really accurate though, nice work.
Thanks, it was all a big waste of time though, I could’ve just recorded a video of me using certain features that i’d want to discuss and then putting slides of explanation about them.