You know…. I actually should do that. Like even if I dumb it down to a camera guy on the scene of the change using 720p then changing to 1080p.

Alright. That\’s good, but making a big deal in a post like this only implies to me that you didn\’t get it. And yes. I am completely fine with it if it is not a thing that is a part of the actual person. To put it short, I don\’t like furries because stuff like this is just insanely odd.

It makes you insanely uncomftorable when people try to normalize something like this. Especially when it is sexual. The furry fandom for this matter just straight up glorifies and normalizes beastiality. It also says that living in a fantasy world is okay. Cartoons are fine, costumes are fine. The lifestyle and idea that you are an animal is not. Fursonas are odd as well. It\’s fine to have an animal character to relate to, but not to represent you. A headband with animal ears is fine. But the tail thing, I can\’t see. I could get by it if it is a costume or just a whole style thing.

2 figures. So like 768 nodes.

No. Depending on the surface it\’s driving on. It ain\’t gonna drift cause of it\’s weight combined with it\’s traction. It\’s a military vehicle.

I\’m focusing on PL and Remasters as well as modern guns right now.

Looks pretty good. Not a fan of the bright and exaggerated gradients but it forms it\’s own shaded style that way. Pretty neat in the customization available. Much better than a trace figure with dumbed down edges. Almost want to kinda go back. Buff my first complete remaster which was the M4 even more with the new gradient circles as well as the new ideas for how it could be customizable. More like a… AR-15 pack that covers all the popular AR-15 platform weapons. But I ain\’t sure that would be easy with how similar the reciever is on all of them, but all the differences.