@explosivebullet
Joined on July 5th, 2017, this user has been a member for 3,290 days and is the 202nd person to register an account.
Has 143 submissions, the first one uploaded on December 22nd, 2016 and the most recent on June 10th, 2025.
Of those, 19 have been featured and 54 have won Users' Choice.
On average, each submission earns 11,018 downloads.
In total, they have been download 1,586,654 times.
Counting every individual stickfigure, including the contents of all packs, this user has technically made and submitted 1,155 stickfigures.
On average, when this user rates stickfigures, they are 95% positive.
Also, they are typically 20% positive when rating animation spotlights.
Has made 6,370 comments on non-activity pages of the site. Alternatively, this user has made 12,497 comments on actual activity pages of the site.
This user also has been featured in the Animation Spotlights 9 times.
This member is a Users' Choice voter!
Their current voting streak is 0 and their longest streak is 1239 consecutive votes.
Spotlight CritiquesOwner
Project Landfall SeriesOwner
X-Ray Collab 2 (Upcoming)Owner
EB Figures and AnimationsOwner
FPS Animation GroupOwner
Stew’s Generic Groupadmin
Questions and Helpadmin
Military Nodersadmin
Mission Breaks Chains Series.admin
War Technicals and Infantry (This Group is very dead)admin
Operation: Containmentadmin
The Ramox seriesadmin
Politics (13+)mod
After the Flash Downfallmod
The Fight For Freedom Seriesmod
Stick Nodes 2 Development Teammod
MK groupmod
Curtis Entertainment Corp.mod
The New Internet War Groupmod
Ramoxfire’s Forge Of Figuresmod
Blades and Guns (weapon guru group) (This Group is very dead)mod
Vault 279mod
Ezora Adventures(RPG and Role-play group!)mod
Marksman Collabmod
#Team StickNodes Movie Aftermathmod
-
Replying to comment by:

-
Replying to comment by:
Yeah.
-
Yeah so this happened. I had to rant a little.
-
Replying to comment by:
Some rough spots but it looks nice. Pretty nice.
-
Replying to comment by:
Alright, but informing people well is key.
-
Replying to comment by:
I could do that within a matter of seconds. Remind me.
-
Replying to comment by:
I\’d recommend showing an exact comparison. Just so people could make a better judgment of what is better for them.
-
Replying to comment by:
No problem. Gonna remain as one of the good ol classic users.
-
Replying to comment by:
Yeah. It was quite a lot of witchcraft.
-
Replying to comment by:
Good knowing you. Guessing you will make visits right? You made quite a staple on the community. Especially in my project with the addition of a sweet new character. But thanks.
-
Replying to comment by:
Didn\’t quite have one. It was basically an angled view. Which doesn\’t work. Just the dust cover and reciever details worked.
-
Replying to comment by:
I had 8 mentions. 15 notifications in general.
-
Replying to comment by:
Accurate. 8 mentions.
-
Replying to comment by:
Use links. After creating them of coarse. I just posted them on the website and used their links.
-
Replying to comment by:
It looks a lot like an SA80 used by the british but not %
100% at all. At some point I will end up making it maybe. - Load More

















Youtube is lewd this days
Yeah.
Wtf youtube are you high
It’s smoking something alright.
First time?
First time getting claimed for something that makes 0 sense.