@ralphandseanson
Joined on April 16th, 2018, this user has been a member for 2,972 days and is the 7,415th person to register an account.
Has 5 submissions, the first one uploaded on April 6th, 2018 and the most recent on February 10th, 2019.
Of those, 0 have been featured and 0 have won Users' Choice.
On average, each submission earns 3,599 downloads.
In total, they have been download 17,995 times.
Counting every individual stickfigure, including the contents of all packs, this user has technically made and submitted 11 stickfigures.
On average, when this user rates stickfigures, they are 66% positive.
Has made 127 comments on non-activity pages of the site. Alternatively, this user has made 336 comments on actual activity pages of the site.
This member is not a Users' Choice voter.
Show More-
Replying to comment by:
I’m too scared to watch NBC shows again…
-
Replying to comment by:
Not showing as a gif for me.
Yes, I didn’t try tapping it.
-
I get what you’re saying, I really do, but nanites aren’t futuristic. The main thing I suppose would be self-replication; I’m fine with removing that.
-
How can I make my character work (the “nanite guy”)?
-
Replying to comment by:
@stickninjas
Gotta say, “floppy sword” is still funny -
Replying to comment by:
There are 10 different strain duos.
-
Replying to comment by:
The 3 game save limit should be removed.
-
Replying to comment by:
Impressive, but that must suck too.
What are your favorite strain duos? I don’t have one yet, but I’m running Fire+Shadow, Fire+Frost, and Lightning+Nature.
-
Replying to comment by:
@ramoxfire1
How far have you gotten? -
Replying to comment by:
I’ve tried that in the past, but it was only practical for perfect circles or random shapes.
-
I need some help appealing to my perfectionism.
So I have this square block, looking down at an angle at it. I want to put a circle in the center of the top face, but it should appear flush (and thus not actually a circle). The green inner square is a guide that should be inscribed in the “circle.”
How can I mathematically and accurately make it?
-
first of all I appreciate this attention to detail and the structured way you’re approaching it with guidelines and using the “split segment” stuff, etc 10/10
secondly, I don’t think there’s really a 100% correct way to do this, I know what you want to do, don’t think it’s doable outside of a brute force way
what I would do is take a small segment and put it on the left-most node there in the green diamond and angle it how I *think* the circle would look
copy it, and paste it on itself (and correct as necessary), copy, paste, paste, paste, paste … it will naturally curve
after some guess and check you’ll get it to where it ends perfectly on the right-side of the green diamond
then just copy that entire arc, paste it, and flip-y, and you’ll have the whole circle
I’ll be amazed if that made sense
-
Replying to:
I’ve tried that in the past, but it was only practical for perfect circles or random shapes.
-
Replying to:
yeah I know what you mean
I can’t really think of a better way
you could also put a bunch of “floating” stretchy nodes in the middle, and polyfill them, then move each one in place and do it by eye
-
-
-
-
Replying to comment by:
I think it’s a feather.
-
Replying to comment by:
Lol
It’s speed, not a damage stat.
-
-
(no idea what this means but will say neat anyway)
neat!
-
3k floppy sword damage
Now that’s how u know someone’s good
-
Replying to:
Lol
It’s speed, not a damage stat.
-
Replying to:
Floppy sword = speed?
-
Replying to:
I think it’s a feather.
-
Replying to:
Ah I see
-
Replying to:
@stickninjas
Gotta say, “floppy sword” is still funny
-
-
-
-
-
-
@ramoxfire1
How far have you gotten?-
Replying to:
Got the final boss but never got past it
-
Replying to:
Impressive, but that must suck too.
What are your favorite strain duos? I don’t have one yet, but I’m running Fire+Shadow, Fire+Frost, and Lightning+Nature.
-
Replying to:
Fire shadow of fire life
-
Replying to:
The 3 game save limit should be removed.
-
Replying to:
There are 10 different strain duos.
-
Replying to:
Ah
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Replying to comment by:
Space Zombies?
F*CK YEAH
- Load More





I get what you’re saying, I really do, but nanites aren’t futuristic. The main thing I suppose would be self-replication; I’m fine with removing that.
@explosivebullet
The whole nanite regeneration thing wouldn’t work. As well if nanomachines would be used in anything, they would use them in humans.