@arcionek
Joined on August 18th, 2017, this user has been a member for 3,243 days and is the 1,949th person to register an account.
Has 13 submissions, the first one uploaded on December 14th, 2016 and the most recent on May 31st, 2019.
Of those, 1 has been featured and 6 have won Users' Choice.
On average, each submission earns 5,425 downloads.
In total, they have been download 75,959 times.
Counting every individual stickfigure, including the contents of all packs, this user has technically made and submitted 52 stickfigures.
On average, when this user rates stickfigures, they are 87% positive.
Also, they are typically 78% positive when rating animation spotlights.
Has made 1,050 comments on non-activity pages of the site. Alternatively, this user has made 12,170 comments on actual activity pages of the site.
This member is a Users' Choice voter!
Their current voting streak is 0 and their longest streak is 27 consecutive votes.
Arc gaming reviewsOwner
Rigging Nerd ClubOwner
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Owner
Temp group will deleteOwner
Stickfigure Starter KitOwner
Stick Nodes Beta TestersOwner
No girls allowedOwner
Sticknodes ModdersOwner
Mod Talkadmin
#TeamArcionekadmin
Admin Talkadmin
-
Replying to comment by:
jesuschristdudehejustmadeajoke
-
Replying to comment by:
So like… Hecc. Shit wack, ain’t it? :’/
Honestly, there are times when I know what to say. At times I don’t, but hey – I guess that’s just part of being human.
You know, gonna be honest. Life can be shit, can be brutal, can be just unfair and just the worst. Yet you know what? It’s still like… Well, life.
We can’t really ask for better life since we only have one, yet over time we get to actually control where it heads off to.My experience? Bullied since 1st grade of elementary for just being skinny, then just a chain reaction of negative reputation surrounding me. Now it’s final grade of high school and that thing didn’t change. 13 years now. Shit still wacky.
But you know, midway through this, while having suicidal crisis there was just one thing that stopped me. Literally when I was about to do it 7 years ago… (Wait fuck I am getting that old so fast wtf) – “Why bother? Why waste ourselves like that? What if someone actually needed my help in the future?” And shit mango look where I am now. All I just want to say is, don’t do it. I know, it’s tough, but we all got u if we can do anything. Mainly it’s just… I guess giving up on that’s how life is and have to kinda suck it up and ignore it. Yeah, it numbed me emotionally for years, yeah I might have not been the most mentally stable either, but hey… I am alive, so you should too. Give future a chance, really.
-
Replying to comment by:
we do have actually temp bans and stuff- just sayin-
so it’s either
a) better not to be intervened
b) we didn’t see
c) it was actually dealt with since we don’t really announce bans etc. -
Replying to comment by:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopic_depth_rendition
honestly i believe it’s much more complex. -
Replying to comment by:
I mean like… Would each increment of 0.1 give illusion of 20cm away from viewer. Maybe 30? Maybe it squares?
-
So like. I had an idea and want to know guesses of rest of the members on this.
Stereoscopic images using SN parallax.
We set up an image or animation that has parallax. Camera scale 1.00
We move camera 180 to left, export, 180 to the right, export.
We put both exports side by side in 1:1 square starting from middle.
Now the question is…
How much depth distance is every 0.1 increment of parallax? -
Replying to comment by:
F.
Also fastest reply in the west
-
Replying to comment by:
Greenland was always the hardest to get to in Plague Inc
-
Replying to comment by:
complains about people forgetting about parallax and never using it
forgets about parallax himself
-
Replying to comment by:
Btw if we are on this parallax bandwagon.
When selecting stick to lock, we could have for how many frames that stick is locked to camera on the left side.
It would act like autocam I guess. Changing parallax value affects all parallax values across the \”linked\” frames of that stick.
This… This would basically save my ass whenever I am like \”oops I should have made parallax 0.2 instead of 0.4\” and have to redo the entire shot.
-
Replying to comment by:
… Unless? 😏
-
Replying to comment by:
Haha just kidding
-
Replying to comment by:
Knew you\’d be like that. So now make the value tweenable as well.
-
Replying to comment by:
\”Hitler thumbs up – Google Images\”
- Load More















1.01
I mean like… Would each increment of 0.1 give illusion of 20cm away from viewer. Maybe 30? Maybe it squares?
I think yes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopic_depth_rendition
honestly i believe it’s much more complex.
this part is understood
A stereogram consists of a pair of two-dimensional frames, one for each eye. The width and height of objects are common to both; Its depth is encoded in the differences between the right and left eye views. The geometric relationship between the third dimension of an object and these differences in position is presented below and depends on the location of the stereo camera lenses and the eyes of the observer. However, other factors contribute to the depth seen in a stereoscopic view and if it corresponds to that of the real object; The act of seeing a stereoscopic screen often alters the three-dimensional perception of observers.
Gey
I FOUND IT!
THE FIRST EVER GEY!
@GIGANSHOWAERA COME LOOK!
Thanks
My mind is literally your profile pic right now.
top ten questions people are too lazy to attempt to answer
including myself